Sendai (@2.1) vs Matsumoto (@3.7)

Our Prediction:

Sendai will win

Sendai – Matsumoto Match Prediction | 06-10-2019 01:00

If you thinks each of the suggested debatetopic is appropriate then answer Yes.( This is called Approvalvote system You can even agree to all of them or none of them. The HEnDA judging committee has narrowed down your suggestions to 5possible debate topics. Please answer the below questionnaire askingwhich topics are appropriate. Thank you for suggesting wonderful debate topic ideas. Deletethe Yess if you think the topic is not suitable, vice versa.

*In case the questioner has to interrupt the opponents answer and move on to the next question, it is required for the questioner to be polite and making proper excuses to the answerer..

Interrupt the speeches, if you think the speeches are too fast. (2) This is not a Recitation contest (Even if some of the rounds may appear to be so!) Dont decide the winners just by eye-contacts, accents, intonation, etc. Please tell the students how to improve their English delivery. just to make the opponents upset). c) The usage of evidence is to be encouraged, not to be discouraged as in some Parliamentary debate contests. However, you should comment on them. Some Notes for the Experienced Judges: (1) This is not a Parliamentary Debate (British impromptu style) tournament: a) Interruption of speeches by the opponents, so called POINT(s) OF INFORMATION is not allowed b) Decide the winners by the outcome of the argument contents (see Section 2), not by cumulative speech points. (3) This is not exactly an American Policy Debate (NDT/CEDA style) tournament a) NEVER encourage fast delivery. Of course those are important for English communication, but as long as the speeches are intelligible, please dont overweigh such speech delivery aspects when deciding the winners. b) Ignore cheap debate tactics (such as phony Topicality, Counterplans etc. 6.

Now, exceptionally for humane reasons, some local autonomies provide livelihood assistance to alien denizens living in poverty. Such assistance should be assumed as being continued. The affirmative side can define whether the minors should receive the same amount as the adults, but other restrictions toward the payments should not be argued (such as, BI should not be provided to the rich). The BI provides income basically only to the Japanese nation.

Your View?

This is, so to say, an indirect attack, and will contribute to the final Summary speech, hence rather recommended. *For example, it is permitted to refute like The importance of Advantages presented in the Constructive speech, outweighs that of the Disadvantages presented in the Negative Constructive speech, because this is not itself an attack to the importance of Disadvantages. Moreover, such defense provides an effective comparison.

Specifically, since the debate is on governmental policy proposition, if the proposition has more merits than the demerits, you vote AFF and vice versa. Judging Standards In this tournament, winner of the round should be decided by comparing the outcome of the arguments of both teams. below for the difference). (If you have judged in other debate tournaments, see Section 6. No ties; always pick a winner! 2.

It should be assumed that the remaining deficit should be covered by increasing the tax rates of the Inheritance tax, the Income tax, and the Consumption tax. The Affirmative side can specify the planned increase rates of these three taxes, in the constructive speech Plan. Basically, the current State spending toward the Public (National) Pensions, Public Assistance, Employment Insurance, and the Child Benefit system, which will all be integrated in to the BI, should be considered as the source of revenue for the BI.

We can focus mainly on delivering a football prediction for the weekend. Some of our football predictions are mathematically based on stats. Most bettors play on Saturday and Sunday, so we will focus our soccer tips on these days. We will make analyses of soccer games and update on our website free football predictions for the weekends. Almost all football games will be from European football championships.

A good AFF summary may present a value criterion insisting that their plan can meet the necessary civil minimum concerning math ability, and the value of such necessary ability outweighs the vague individuality value. Recollect the latter stage speeches (summary) of the debaters. In that case, a judge should compare the ADs and the DAs rationally, using ones own value judgments. (For example, AFF insisted that each child should have enough math ability but NEG argued that childrens individuality should have priority. Such comparison should be done by the debaters themselves. If the NEG can not present a counter-criterion, a judge should decide in favor of the AFF). If a team has explained the value criteria for deciding whether the ADs outweigh the DAs, such debaters criteria should be used to determine the winner. Which is more important? In some debates, neither team is able to present such value criterion effectively. Try to avoid your own point of view coming in.

5. Best Debater

The debate rather focuses on whether the patients should be given a choice. However, it should be emphasized that, even the AFF position defined above does not claim that we should choose active euthanasia. Since some religions explicitly condemns the practice of euthanasia, there may be cases that the students may hesitate to participate in this debate for religious reasons. HEnDA advises teachers or teams not to force any students to take their positions totally against their conscience.